LogoLogo
  • Introduction
    • What is Arichain
    • Why Arichain
    • Vision: Redefining Layer 1, Empowering Every Builder.
    • TL;DR Summary for Builders
    • Details to read
  • Architectural Philosophy
    • Monolithic vs Modular: Why Multi-VM
    • Native Composability over Interoperability
    • Unified Chain State and Execution Environment
    • Chain Structure: Multi-VM under One Consensus
    • Identity & User Abstraction
  • General Architecture Overview
    • Multi-VM Execution Environment
    • Consensus Mechanism
    • Token Design
    • Unified Gas System
    • GAID: Global Account Identity
    • Future Roadmap
  • Technical Overview
    • Consensus Protocol Details
    • Token Design and Interoperability
    • Gas System Architecture
    • GAID Architecture
    • State Management
    • Bridge Infrastructure
  • Developer Experience
    • SDK
    • Developer tools
  • Validator
    • Validator Roles & Node Types
    • Reward System
    • Staking
    • Use Cases
    • Node Operations
  • Security
    • Design Goals
    • Threat Model and Risk Assessment
    • Continuous Security Verification
  • Token Economics & Validator Incentives
    • Token Utility
    • Validator Incentives
    • Token Supply and Distribution
    • Onboarding Workflow
  • Roadmap
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Security

Design Goals

Core Security Principles

Arichain's security model is built on fundamental principles that ensure robust protection across multiple virtual machine environments while maintaining performance and usability.

Multi-Layer Defense Architecture Our security approach implements defense in depth across multiple layers:

  • Protocol Layer: Cryptographic security for consensus and state management

  • VM Isolation: Strict separation between EVM and SVM execution environments

  • Bridge Security: Multi-signature validation for bridge operations

  • Network Layer: DDoS protection and network-level attack mitigation

  • Application Layer: Smart contract security best practices and formal verification

Zero-Trust Multi-VM Operations Every Multi-VM interaction is treated as potentially hostile:

  • Cryptographic Verification: All Multi-VM messages require cryptographic proofs

  • Consensus Validation: Bridge operations require validator consensus

  • Atomic Execution: Multi-VM operations either complete fully or rollback completely

  • Timeout Protection: Operations have strict time bounds to prevent hanging states

  • Fraud Detection: Real-time monitoring for suspicious Multi-VM activity

Economic Security Model Security is reinforced through economic incentives and penalties:

  • Validator Stakes: Economic commitment ensures honest behavior

  • Slashing Mechanisms: Financial penalties for malicious actions

  • Insurance Pools: Community funds to cover potential losses

  • Bug Bounties: Rewards for security researchers finding vulnerabilities

PreviousSecurityNextThreat Model and Risk Assessment

Last updated 24 days ago