Threat Model and Risk Assessment
Arichain's security framework addresses real-world vulnerabilities observed in major blockchain incidents, implementing comprehensive defense mechanisms against known attack vectors.
MEV Bot and Sandwich Attacks Problem: Malicious bots exploit transaction ordering to steal value from users
Private Mempool: Hide pending transactions from bots until execution
Fair Value Distribution: Redirect extracted value to users and validators instead of attackers
Unpredictable Ordering: Randomize transaction processing to prevent exploitation
Flash Loan and DeFi Exploits Problem: Attackers manipulate protocols using borrowed funds and code vulnerabilities
Built-in Safety Checks: Automatic protection against dangerous transaction patterns
Borrowing Limits: Restrict maximum loan amounts to prevent large-scale manipulation
Mathematical Verification: Require mathematical proof that smart contracts work correctly
Bridge and Cross-Chain Attacks Problem: Hackers target bridges between blockchains to steal funds
Protocol-Native Security: Use same validators as main blockchain instead of separate bridge operators
Multiple Signature Requirements: Require approval from multiple validators for large transfers
Mathematical Proof System: Verify all bridge operations using cryptographic mathematics
Network Outages and Validator Issues Problem: Single validator problems can shut down entire networks
Graduated Punishment System: Warn, suspend, or penalize validators based on violation severity
Continuous Operation: Network keeps running even when some validators fail
Automatic Recovery: Replace problematic validators without manual intervention
Protocol Update Vulnerabilities Problem: Different virtual machines have inconsistent update procedures
Unified Update Process: Single governance system for all virtual machine updates
Comprehensive Testing: Test all updates across every virtual machine environment
Gradual Deployment: Roll out changes slowly with ability to reverse if problems occur
Bot and Economic Manipulation Problem: Automated attacks and large-scale market manipulation
Behavioral Detection: Identify and limit suspicious automated activity patterns
Dynamic Fee Adjustment: Charge higher fees for detected bot traffic
Circuit Breakers: Automatically halt large operations that could destabilize the network
Consensus and Network-Level Attacks Problem: Attempts to control or disrupt the blockchain's core operations
Geographic Distribution: Spread validators globally to prevent localized attacks
Economic Security: Require significant financial stake from validators to ensure honest behavior
Redundant Infrastructure: Multiple backup systems prevent single points of failure
Smart Contract and Application Security Problem: Bugs and vulnerabilities in applications built on the blockchain
Formal Verification Requirements: Mathematical proof that critical contracts work correctly
Regular Security Audits: Professional security reviews by leading firms
Real-time Monitoring: Continuous analysis of contract behavior for anomalies
Social Engineering and Governance Attacks Problem: Manipulation of human operators and governance processes
Multi-signature Governance: Require multiple approvals for important decisions
Transparent Processes: Public visibility of all governance activities
Community Alert System: Early warning system for suspicious governance activity
This multi-layered defense approach ensures Arichain remains secure against both current threats and future attack methods as the blockchain ecosystem evolves.
Last updated