LogoLogo
  • Introduction
    • What is Arichain
    • Why Arichain
    • Vision: Redefining Layer 1, Empowering Every Builder.
    • TL;DR Summary for Builders
    • Details to read
  • Architectural Philosophy
    • Monolithic vs Modular: Why Multi-VM
    • Native Composability over Interoperability
    • Unified Chain State and Execution Environment
    • Chain Structure: Multi-VM under One Consensus
    • Identity & User Abstraction
  • General Architecture Overview
    • Multi-VM Execution Environment
    • Consensus Mechanism
    • Token Design
    • Unified Gas System
    • GAID: Global Account Identity
    • Future Roadmap
  • Technical Overview
    • Consensus Protocol Details
    • Token Design and Interoperability
    • Gas System Architecture
    • GAID Architecture
    • State Management
    • Bridge Infrastructure
  • Developer Experience
    • SDK
    • Developer tools
  • Validator
    • Validator Roles & Node Types
    • Reward System
    • Staking
    • Use Cases
    • Node Operations
  • Security
    • Design Goals
    • Threat Model and Risk Assessment
    • Continuous Security Verification
  • Token Economics & Validator Incentives
    • Token Utility
    • Validator Incentives
    • Token Supply and Distribution
    • Onboarding Workflow
  • Roadmap
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Security

Threat Model and Risk Assessment

Arichain's security framework addresses real-world vulnerabilities observed in major blockchain incidents, implementing comprehensive defense mechanisms against known attack vectors.

MEV Bot and Sandwich Attacks Problem: Malicious bots exploit transaction ordering to steal value from users

  1. Private Mempool: Hide pending transactions from bots until execution

  2. Fair Value Distribution: Redirect extracted value to users and validators instead of attackers

  3. Unpredictable Ordering: Randomize transaction processing to prevent exploitation

Flash Loan and DeFi Exploits Problem: Attackers manipulate protocols using borrowed funds and code vulnerabilities

  1. Built-in Safety Checks: Automatic protection against dangerous transaction patterns

  2. Borrowing Limits: Restrict maximum loan amounts to prevent large-scale manipulation

  3. Mathematical Verification: Require mathematical proof that smart contracts work correctly

Bridge and Cross-Chain Attacks Problem: Hackers target bridges between blockchains to steal funds

  1. Protocol-Native Security: Use same validators as main blockchain instead of separate bridge operators

  2. Multiple Signature Requirements: Require approval from multiple validators for large transfers

  3. Mathematical Proof System: Verify all bridge operations using cryptographic mathematics

Network Outages and Validator Issues Problem: Single validator problems can shut down entire networks

  1. Graduated Punishment System: Warn, suspend, or penalize validators based on violation severity

  2. Continuous Operation: Network keeps running even when some validators fail

  3. Automatic Recovery: Replace problematic validators without manual intervention

Protocol Update Vulnerabilities Problem: Different virtual machines have inconsistent update procedures

  1. Unified Update Process: Single governance system for all virtual machine updates

  2. Comprehensive Testing: Test all updates across every virtual machine environment

  3. Gradual Deployment: Roll out changes slowly with ability to reverse if problems occur

Bot and Economic Manipulation Problem: Automated attacks and large-scale market manipulation

  1. Behavioral Detection: Identify and limit suspicious automated activity patterns

  2. Dynamic Fee Adjustment: Charge higher fees for detected bot traffic

  3. Circuit Breakers: Automatically halt large operations that could destabilize the network

Consensus and Network-Level Attacks Problem: Attempts to control or disrupt the blockchain's core operations

  1. Geographic Distribution: Spread validators globally to prevent localized attacks

  2. Economic Security: Require significant financial stake from validators to ensure honest behavior

  3. Redundant Infrastructure: Multiple backup systems prevent single points of failure

Smart Contract and Application Security Problem: Bugs and vulnerabilities in applications built on the blockchain

  1. Formal Verification Requirements: Mathematical proof that critical contracts work correctly

  2. Regular Security Audits: Professional security reviews by leading firms

  3. Real-time Monitoring: Continuous analysis of contract behavior for anomalies

Social Engineering and Governance Attacks Problem: Manipulation of human operators and governance processes

  1. Multi-signature Governance: Require multiple approvals for important decisions

  2. Transparent Processes: Public visibility of all governance activities

  3. Community Alert System: Early warning system for suspicious governance activity

This multi-layered defense approach ensures Arichain remains secure against both current threats and future attack methods as the blockchain ecosystem evolves.

PreviousDesign GoalsNextContinuous Security Verification

Last updated 24 days ago